Literatur

Einführung in die Methoden & Versuchsplanung

• Bortz, J., Döring, N. (2006) Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation. Berlin: Springer
• Goodwin, C. J. (2009) Research in Psychology. Hoboken NJ: Wiley
• Hecht, H., Desnizza, W. (2012) Psychologie als empirische Wissenschaft. Berlin: Springer
• Herzog, W. (2012) Wissenschafts-theoretische Grundlagen der Psychologie. Berlin: Springer
• Hussy, W., & Jain, A. (2002). Experimentelle Hypothesenprüfung in der Psychologie. Göttingen: Hogrefe
• Hussy, W., Schreier, M., Echterhoff, G. (2010) Forschungsmethoden in Psychologie und Sozialwissenschaften für Bachelor. Berlin: Springer
• Kukla, A., & Walmsley, J. (2006). Mind: A Historical and Philosophical Introduction to the Major Theories. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing
• Sarris, V. (1992) Methodologische Grundlagen der Experimentalpsychologie, Bd.2, Versuchsplanung und Stadien des psychologischen Experiments. München: UTB
• Schnell, R., Hill, P.B., Esser, E. (2011) Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung. München: Oldenbourg
• Whitley, B.E., Kite, M.E. (2013) Principles of Research in Behavioral Science. New York: Routledge
• Walach, H. (2013) Psychologie: Wissenschaftstheorie, philosophische Grundlagen und Geschichte. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer

Kognitive Modellierung

• Anders, R., Alario, F. X., & Van Maanen, L. (2016). The shifted Wald distribution for response time data analysis. Psychological methods, 21(3), 309.
• Anderson, B. (2014). Computational neuroscience and cognitive modelling: a student's introduction to methods and procedures. Sage.
• Andres, J.: Das allgemeine lineare Modell. In Edgar Erdfelder, Rainer Mausfeld, Thorsten Meiser & Georg Rudinger (Hrsg.), Handbuch quantitative Methoden, 1996 (S.185-200); Weinheim: Belz.
• Bundesen, C., & Habekost, T. (2007). Models of attention.
• Busemeyer, J. R., & Diederich, A. (2010). Cognitive modeling. Sage.
• Balota, D. A., & Yap, M. J. (2011). Moving beyond the mean in studies of mental chronometry: The power of response time distributional analyses. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(3), 160–166.
• Bundesen, C., & Habekost, T. (2007). Models of attention.
• Forstmann, B. U., Ratcliff, R., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2016). Sequential sampling models in cognitive neuroscience: Advantages, applications, and extensions. Annual review of psychology, 67.
• Goldstone, R. L., & Janssen, M. A. (2005). Computational models of collective behavior. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(9), 424–430.
• Grimm, V., Revilla, E., Berger, U., Jeltsch, F., Mooij, W. M., Railsback, S. F., … DeAngelis, D. L. (2005). Pattern-oriented modeling of agent-based complex systems: Lessons from ecology. Science, 310(5750), 987–991.
• Heathcote, A., & Brown, S. (2015). An Introduction to Good Practices in Cognitive An Introduction to Good Practices in Cognitive Modeling. Springer.
• Honing, H. (2006). The role of surprise in theory testing: Some preliminary observations. In Proceedings of the international conference on music perception and cognition (pp. 38–42).
• Izhikevich, E. M. (2007). Solving the distal reward problem through linkage of STDP and dopamine signaling. Cerebral Cortex, 17(10), 2443–2452.
• Kelso, J. A. S. (1997). Dynamic Patterns: The Self-Organization of Behavior.
• Lins, J., & Schöner, G. (2014). A Neural Approach to Cognition Based on Dynamic Field Theory. Neural Fields, 319–339.
• Macho, S. (2002). Cognitive modeling with spreadsheets. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 34(1), 19–36.
• Matzke, D., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2009). Psychological interpretation of the ex-Gaussian and shifted Wald parameters: A diffusion model analysis. Psychonomic bulletin & review, 16(5), 798-817.
• McClelland, J. L. (2009). The Place of Modeling in Cognitive Science. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1(1), 11–38.
• McKerchar, T. L., Green, L., Myerson, J., Pickford, T. S., Hill, J. C., & Stout, S. C. (2009). A comparison of four models of delay discounting in humans. Behavioural processes, 81(2), 256-259.
• Miller, R., Scherbaum, S., Heck, D. W., Goschke, T., & Enge, S. (2017). On the relation between the (censored) shifted Wald and the Wiener distribution as measurement models for choice response times. Applied Psychological Measurement, 0146621617710465.
• Ratcliff, R., Smith, P. L., Brown, S. D., & McKoon, G. (2016). Diffusion Decision Model: Current Issues and History. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(4), 260–281.
• Ratcliff, R., Spieler, D., & Mckoon, G. (2000). Explicitly modeling the effects of aging on response time. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7(1), 1-25.
• Rey, G. D., & Wender, K. F. (2008). Neuronale Netze: eine Einführung in die Grundlagen, Anwendungen und Datenauswertung.
• Rudolf, M., & Müller, J. (2012). Multivariate Verfahren: eine praxisorientierte Einführung mit Anwendungsbeispielen in SPSS. Hogrefe Verlag.
• Sandamirskaya, Y., Zibner, S. K. U., Schneegans, S., & Schöner, G. (2013). Using Dynamic Field Theory to extend the embodiment stance toward higher cognition. New Ideas in Psychology, 31(3), 322–339.
• Sequential sampling models in cognitive neuroscience: Advantages, applications, and extensions. Annual review of psychology, 67.
• Siegfried, R. (2009). Agent-based modeling and simulation. In Modeling and Simulation of Complex Systems (pp. 86–98).
• Schoner, G., & Kelso, J. A. (1988). Dynamic pattern generation in behavioral and neural systems. Science, 239(4847), 1513–1520.
• Siegfried, R. (2009). Agent-based modeling and simulation. In Modeling and Simulation of Complex Systems (pp. 86–98).
• Tuller, B., Case, P., Ding, M., & Kelso, J. A. S. (1994). The nonlinear dynamics of speech categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20(1), 3–16.
• Stephan, A., & Walter, S. (Eds.). (2013). Handbuch Kognitionswissenschaft. Springer-Verlag.
• Voss, A., Rothermund, K., Gast, A., & Wentura, D. (2013). Cognitive processes in associative and categorical priming: A diffusion model analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142(2), 536.
• Wilensky, U., & Resnick, M. (1999). Springer Thinking in Levels: A Dynamic Systems Approach to Making Sense of the World Thinking in Levels: A Dynamic Systems Approach to Making Sense of the World. Source: Journal of Science Education and Technology Journal of Science Education and Technology, 8(1), 3–19.